[매일경제 스타투데이 박세연 기자]
The former manager, who had been fighting with actor Shin Hyun-jun, refuted Shin Hyun-joon’s allegations of innocence and made an additional position.
Kim Mo, who previously worked as a manager of Shin Hyun-jun, said through a legal representative on the 22nd, “Shin Hyun-joon claimed that the prosecution had concluded the case without charge regarding the controversy over the Gap-jil controversy that I brought up and the controversy about taking the drug. However, this reveals that this is not true,” he put forward with a controversy and propofol-related stance.
Regarding the Gapjil controversy, Mr. Kim said, “I have never asked an investigative agency to investigate the Gapjil controversy against Shin Hyun-jun. Therefore, Shin Hyun-joon’s argument to the effect that the Gap-jil controversy against Shin Hyun-jun turned out to be untrue is true. No.”
Mr. Kim said, “However, among the clarifications released by Shin Hyun-joon regarding the controversy, there were several false facts that could damage my reputation, and the investigative agency raised the issue, but the investigation agency was interviewed by someone other than Shin Hyun-joon. As it was announced in the process of refuting the content, I only made a decision of innocence because it was difficult to see that there was intention of defamation or the purpose of slandering me.”
Regarding the propofol medication, he said, “In the past, there have been issues with regard to Shin Hyun-jun’s medication, but the complaint has already been rejected because the statute of limitations has passed.” “However, separately from this, the issue I requested for an investigation was whether the explanation of Hyun-Jun Shin who said that I introduced the hospital to Hyun-Jun Shin was false, even though I had not introduced the hospital that received the Propopul drug to Shin Hyun-Jun. The investigative agency has only made a decision not to charge Shin Hyun-jun because it is difficult to see that the expression’introduced’ is an expression that could damage my honor.’
Mr. Kim said, “Rather, after revealing that I had been unfairly treated by Shin Hyun-jun in the past, several people who worked with or related to Shin Hyun-jun agreed with Shin Hyun-jun and received the salary of a junior road manager from Shin Hyun-jun through media interviews and paid it. “I filed a complaint against some of these people for defamation, etc., because I had defamed my reputation by stating that I had committed a fraudulent act that did not return the investment money after recruiting investors, pretending to be the manager of Shin Hyun-jun,” he said.
Mr. Kim said, “In this regard, the prosecution admitted my allegations as facts and prosecuted Mr. Lee for defamation due to false facts in a timely manner, and the police sent him to the prosecution for prosecution of insults, and the police investigated other related persons. We inform you that it is in progress,” he said.
Mr. Kim added, “Shin Hyun-jun is currently suing the prosecution for defamation because the contents of my disclosure are false,” he added. “I will reveal my position again after the prosecution’s investigation results come out.”
In July of last year, Shin Hyun-jun was caught up in a controversy about ‘gap-jil’ due to the disclosure of former manager Kim Mo. Representative Kim vomited out of resentment by claiming that he had been treated unfairly for 13 years from Shin Hyun-jun, but Shin Hyun-joon regretted that “if some of the stories of all the years are listed in the name of revelation, it could become another type of violence. The case was ended after the prosecutor’s office in February decided not to prosecute the charges.
1. I am Kim OO, who previously worked as a manager for actor Shin Hyun-jun. Recently, Shin Hyun-jun claimed that the prosecution had closed the case without charge in relation to the controversy over the Gap-jil controversy and the drug administration controversy that he raised. .
① Regarding the controversy
I have not asked an investigative agency to investigate the controversy itself against Hyun-jun Shin. Therefore, Shin Hyun-jun’s argument to the effect that the controversy over Shin Hyun-jun has been found to be untrue is not true.
However, I raised the issue as there were several false facts that could damage my honor among the clarifications released by Shin Hyun-jun regarding the controversy about Gap-jil, but the investigative agency was not interviewed by Shin Hyun-jun, but others around him. The decision was made without charge because it was difficult to say that it was the content or that it was announced in the process of refuting the content of the interview, and that it was difficult to believe that it was intended to slander or defam the person.
② Proposal related
In the past, I have raised a problem related to Shin Hyun-jun’s administration of Propople, but the complaint was rejected because the statute of limitations was already exceeded.
However, separately from this, the case that I requested for an investigation was as if I had not introduced the hospital that received the propopul to Shin Hyun-jun, as if he had introduced the hospital to Shin Hyun-jun. In response to this, the investigative agency has only decided not to charge Shin Hyun-jun because it is difficult to see that the expression’introduced’ is an expression that could damage his honor.
2. Rather, after revealing that he had been unfairly treated by Shin Hyun-jun in the past, several people who worked with or related to Shin Hyun-jun agreed to Shin Hyun-jun and received the salary of a junior road manager from Shin Hyun-jun through a media interview. The person did not pay after he did not pay, or by stating that he had committed a fraudulent act of not returning the investment after recruiting investors under the pretense of being a manager of Shin Hyun-jun. In response to this, the prosecution recognized his claim as fact and prosecuted Mr. Lee for defamation due to false facts in a timely manner, and the police sent him to the prosecution as an opinion of insults. We inform you that a police investigation is underway.
3. Currently, Mr. Shin Hyun-joon has sued the prosecutor for defamation on the grounds that the contents of his disclosure are false, so we will inform you that he will re-state his position after the results of the prosecution’s investigation in the future.
2020. 1. 22.
Kim OO Legal Attorney Apro
Attorney Son Seok-Bong
Photo｜Star Today DB
[ⓒ 매일경제 & mk.co.kr, 무단전재 및 재배포 금지]