Mexico /
Although it is a reprehensible act leak of the complaint of Emilio Lozoya Austin, this will not affect the investigation folder that the Office of the Attorney General of the Republic integratesNor will it violate the presumption of innocence of the aforementioned politicians, said the constitutionalist Alberto Woolrich.
He stressed that it is an obligation of the authority to discover which of the two parties leaked the document, that is, the FGR or the defense of the former director of Petróleos Mexicanos.
“On the one hand, if you realize it, the first page of the complaint bears a stamp that says the prosecutor’s office, the private attorney general of the Republic. So it is possible that the leak came from the Office of Parties that received this complaint. And the other than the lawyers; but in the case of lawyers, it would be very difficult for them to do it, because they are not going to stab themselves that may affect your relationship with your own client”, He expressed.
(Photo: Jesús Quintanar)
Alberto Woolrich assured that the leak will not affect the presumption of innocence, because according to the international treaties to which Mexico is a party, it can only be enforce before the courts, that is, before the judges when people like Emilio Lozoya are in process.
Photo: Octavio Hoyos
“Does not affect the presumption of innocence in the integration of an investigation folder, because the crime is hardly being investigated. The presumption of absolutely no one has been upset until now, “she added.
As regards due process, the constitutionalist said that it is divided into several parts, such as the intervention of social representations, which are investigations.
“Then it could exclusively affect that leak in the investigation, by alerting the possible perpetrators that they are being investigated, which may give rise to processing amparos and trying to evade the action of justice through protection proceedings.
“But in the strictly legal fund it does not affect. However, let twenty personalities think differently; they have their interests, defenders have other types of interests, social representatives have other types of interests ”, he explained.
Questioned about the comments of President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, who asked the FGR release the video of the alleged bribery and Emilio Lozoya’s complaint, and later they appeared on social networks, Woolrich replied:
“It is what should be avoided, because obviously if the President of the Republic is already speaking as a case under trial, there will be no shortage of judges or public ministries, who bend to that whim and carry out the proceedings in an altered way”, emphasized Alberto Woolrich.
Bgpa
–
– .
