Home » News » Dynastic Politics: 21% of Indian MPs from Political Families

Dynastic Politics: 21% of Indian MPs from Political Families

by Emma Walker – News Editor

New ⁤delhi, September ⁣12, ‌2025 – Over 21% of sitting Members of Parliament (MPs), Members ​of Legislative Assemblies (MLAs), and ‍Members of Legislative⁤ Councils ​(MLCs) in India hail from‍ dynastic‌ political backgrounds, according to a new analysis released today by ⁣the ‌Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR). The‌ report underscores ⁢the persistent influence of political‍ families in India’s electoral landscape, raising questions about equitable portrayal ‌and democratic access.

The ⁢ADR’s study, ⁣encompassing a total of 5,204‍ elected representatives across State Assemblies, the Lok Sabha, the rajya sabha, and State Legislative Councils, identified 1,107 individuals‍ with familial ties to politicians. The‌ Lok Sabha‍ exhibits the highest concentration of dynastic ‍representation at‌ 31%,while State Assemblies have the lowest at ‌20%. Legislative Councils ⁢fall somewhere in between, contributing to the overall 21%⁣ figure.

Regionally, the prevalence⁢ of ‌dynastic politics varies substantially. Uttar Pradesh leads in North India with‍ 23%⁣ of ⁤its ⁢analyzed legislators from dynastic backgrounds, followed by Rajasthan at 18%. In the⁢ South, Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka report the highest rates​ at 34% ‍and 29% respectively. ‌Eastern and Northeastern India show varying levels, with​ Bihar at 27% and Assam at 9%.

In terms of absolute numbers, Uttar Pradesh has the highest count with 141 (23%) of its 604 MPs, MLAs, and MLCs linked to political families. Maharashtra follows closely with 129 (32%) out‍ of 403,while Bihar and⁣ Karnataka have 96 (27%) out of 360 and​ 94 (29%) out of 326 respectively. Andhra Pradesh demonstrates the ⁣highest proportional representation, with 86 (34%) of its 255 sitting mps, MLAs, and ⁣MLCs originating from political families.

“These figures highlight⁢ the continued ‍and widespread prevalence of‍ dynastic politics, particularly in ⁢politically meaningful States,”⁤ the ADR stated in a press release ‍accompanying the report. The organization’s findings contribute to an ⁤ongoing⁢ debate about the need for greater transparency ⁣and reforms to promote a more level ​playing field in Indian elections.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.