Home » today » World » Crushing report on the NAV scandal: – The main responsibility lies with NAV and the ministry – VG

Crushing report on the NAV scandal: – The main responsibility lies with NAV and the ministry – VG

The government-appointed investigation committee confirms that EEA law has been mispracticed in the social security law scandal, but the committee disagrees on how far back the practice goes.

The committee criticizes all the bodies involved in the case.

– The main responsibility lies with NAV and the Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs, says committee leader Finn Arnesen, who emphasizes that the case could have looked completely different if only one of the bodies had seen the error.

Arnesen adds that the report is not unanimous: The majority believes that the law in the area has been the same since 1994. The minority has a different view, and sees 2012 as an important time in this case.

In the report’s conclusion, the committee writes, among other things, the following: «Absence of critical thinking, good organization, and behavior in accordance with the responsibilities of the various bodies, has meant that the significance of EEA law has been in the blind spot for almost everyone involved. The result is that individuals have been unjustly stopped benefits, received demands for reimbursement of social security, been labeled as social security abusers, and have also been sentenced to prison on incorrect grounds “.

– It is a system failure where almost all agencies have failed in this area. As chief political leader, I will make an unreserved apology to everyone involved, says Minister of Labor and Social Affairs Torbjørn Røe Isaksen.

Finn Arnesen heads the investigation committee for the social security law scandal. Photo: Krister Sørbø, VG

A year later

It is almost a year since it first became known to NAV and the Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs that social security recipients may for years have been wrongly convicted of social security fraud. The investigative committee that was set up to investigate the case has been working on it since November.

The leader of the committee, law professor Finn Arnesen, had said in advance that there would be an explanation as to why the mispractice took place, and why it took so long.

– Our investigations show that there are not many who have anything special to be proud of in this case, Arnesen told NTB on Friday.

When the committee submitted its first interim report in March, they concluded that it did not look at the period after the new Social Security Regulation was introduced in 2012. EFTA’s control body, ESA, has warned that the malpractice could potentially go all the way back to 1 January. 1994, when the EEA Agreement entered into force.

Read the whole story: The NAV scandal

So far, 1,643 people have been affected by the misinterpretation. In addition, around 3,000 have received incorrect rejections of social security applications.

VG updates the case.

Commercial Cooperation: Discount Codes

1 thought on “Crushing report on the NAV scandal: – The main responsibility lies with NAV and the ministry – VG”

  1. Norway, has, since at least 1997, declared as resident in Norway “for tax purposes” * EU nationals not meeting the requirements to be registered as living or live legally in Norway and forced them to contribute to the Norwegian National Insurance Scheme (folketrygden). The EU nationals’ native lands ceased to define affected individuals as habitually resident.

    Norway then argued EU nationals, physically in Norway, could not receive benefits, including free health care on the grounds they were not registered as living in Norway or worked in nations other than Norway or aboard ships not sailing under the Norwegian flag ** and could therefore not be members of folketrygden. Norway continues to insist EU nationals must pay into folketrygden despite them being unable to get any benefits in return.

    What happened with “NAV Skandalen” is some Norwegians got caught up in a system designed to ensure the huge numbers of migrant workers Norway, needed to exploit North Sea oil and the wealth it brought, could not settle in Norway, export their wages or derive benefits including healthcare and pensions from their forced contributions to folketrygden

    Affected individuals ceased to be entitled to any benefits anywhere, fell into destitution and, one presumes, died prematurely

    The EU has remained steadfastly silent and unconcerned as to NAV Skandalen’s likely death toll and its role in what might amount to facilitating “modern slavery” in Norway via encouraging “freedom of movement” of EU citizens whose “fundamental rights” were not, and could not be, enforced anywhere

    * following Norwegian law no 10 of April 5th 1963
    ** following sections 2-1 and 2-14 of the Norwegian National Insurance Act

    Reply

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.