The media, Ahmed Schubert, confirmed what he published on the seventh day before regarding the eighth item in the contract of Abdullah Al-Saeed, a player currently and Al-Ahly, who prevents the Football Association from interfering in the crisis. The contract confirms that in the event of a dispute between the Egyptian Al-Ahly milk or the player or Al-Ahly Jeddah, the International Football Association “FIFA” is the only one responsible for resolving the crisis, indicating that the crisis ended with the decision of FIFA to reject Al-Ahly’s complaint against the player.
The Football Association attributed the reason for not being eligible to interfere in the Abdullah Al-Saeed crisis with Al-Ahly to the eighth clause of the contract, the tripartite agreement between the player, Al-Ahly and Al-Ahly in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, which stipulates that in the event of any conflict, FIFA is the only party entitled to decide on this conflict .
Abdullah Al-Saeed–
The eighth clause of the contract states that “all parties have agreed that in the event of any dispute that may arise in connection with this contract, the International Football Association” FIFA “shall be sought, and only the other person is the specialist in deciding on this dispute or dispute, in order to take the appropriate decision. According to the rules and laws regulating this … The decision will be final in this regard. “
Al-Ahly submitted a complaint to the Egyptian Football Association to claim the club’s right with Abdullah Al-Saeed, after the latter canceled his contract with Al-Ahly Jeddah and returned to join an Egyptian club (Pyramids) without Al-Ahly receiving the value of the penalty clause stipulated in the tripartite contract concluded between Al-Ahly and Al-Ahly Jeddah And the player when Al-Saeed moved to the Saudi club two years ago.
Al-Ahly’s complaint came to the Egyptian Football Association after receiving FIFA’s response that it is no longer dependent on resolving the dispute regarding the club’s dues, because the player is currently within the ranks of an Egyptian club, and therefore the matter became an internal matter and the one responsible for it is the Egyptian Football Association.
FIFA’s response to the club also included that it explored the position of Al-Ahly Jeddah in the crisis, which stated that the player was the one who broke his contract and joined the Egyptian Pyramids club, so the club administration made the aforementioned complaint to the Football Association to preserve the rights of Al-Ahly, especially that the administration resorted to since The beginning of the Football Association regarding the same crisis, and his response came quickly that he is not responsible for settling this dispute because there is an external party and he is the family of his Saudi grandfather; consequently, the club took refuge in FIFA, and received the response that was previously mentioned.
The Football Association confirmed that Al-Ahly is required to pay 15,000 Swiss francs to the FIFA, the rest of the value of filing a complaint against the Pyramids player Abdullah Al-Saeed.
Football Association officials explained that Al-Ahly had paid 5 thousand Swiss francs in advance when submitting the complaint, and he must pay the rest of the amount since the value of the complaint amounts to 20 thousand Swiss francs.
FIFA had rejected Al-Ahly’s complaint against Abdullah Al-Saeed, stressing that it was an internal matter, as Al-Ahly submitted another complaint against the player to obtain 2 million dollars, the value of the penalty clause in the tripartite contract between Al-Ahly, Abdullah and Al-Ahly in Saudi Arabia..
– .
:quality(80)/cdn-kiosk-api.telegraaf.nl/1edb0256-84e2-11ea-9f17-02d1dbdc35d1.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)
