Home » today » Sport » Church to CM: ‘Kulusevski down, Parma misses a clear penalty. The penalties granted to Lazio and Genoa … ‘| First page

Church to CM: ‘Kulusevski down, Parma misses a clear penalty. The penalties granted to Lazio and Genoa … ‘| First page

The appointment of the our SOS Arbitri column with Massimo Chiesa. The former international referee, exclusively to Calciomercato.com, puts under the magnifying glass the main cases of slow motion of each day of Serie A, the positive aspects (if any) and assigns the votes to the referees of the top Italian championship. Below is a summary of the disputed episodes of the 28th matchday of Serie A:

VOTES AND JUDGES TO THE REFEREES of the 28th day (WITHOUT THE AID OF THE VAR):

Juventus-Lecce: Piccinini 6 (Var Valeri). “Just the direct expulsion of Lucioni for a last-man foul against Bentancur. The penalty given to Juventus for Rossettini’s delayed intervention on Cristiano Ronaldo is also inevitable.”

Brescia-Genoa: Irrati 5 (Var Rocchi). “The Brescia Papetti player hits that of Genoa Romero during an air fight: the contact seems light, but for Irrati it is a penalty. The penalty awarded to the rossoblù is very generous. No doubt in the second episode: Dessena at 69 ‘hits the ball with one arm and it’s a penalty with a yellow card for the Brescia player “.

Cagliari-Torino: Mariani 6 (Var Easter). “The referee at 42 ‘sees a penalty for Cagliari at the hands of Nkoulou. Var Easter calls him back to the monitor and he retraces his steps, removing the penalty: Nkoulou is in fact hit by the ball behind his shoulder. At 68’ naive Nkoulou who tricks Pellegrini: the penalty awarded to Cagliari is correct “.

Lazio-Fiorentina: Fabbri 6 (Var Mazzoleni). “At 66 ‘Caicedo falls to the ground in the Fiorentina area: the referee is a penalty. The purple goalkeeper Dragowski hooks the foot of the Lazio striker who seemed to be already falling. The referee is close to the action and evaluates the penalty contact, the Var cannot do anything in front of a clear evaluation. Doubts remain on the decision. Corrected the red directed to Vlahovic for the elbow to Patric “.

Milan-Roma: Giacomelli 6 (Var Orsato). “At 22 ‘Pellegrini enters Bennacer with a strained leg: the intervention is at the limit, but the yellow is right. Solar the penalty granted to Milan in the final, when Theo Hernandez is hooked by Smalling in the area”.

Napoli-Spal: Pairetto 6 (Var Nasca). “Enough evening for the referee, not for his second assistant who is denied twice by the Var on the goal of Mertens and on the non-goal of Insigne”.

Parma-Inter: Maresca 5.5 (Var Guide). “At 20 ‘the ball ends on Kurtic’s wide arm, the referee Maresca is called by the Var to evaluate an episode that could have led to a penalty, but the whole is invalidated by Godin’s offside (who hits the ball before Kurtic) The assistant should have already seen the irregular position of the Inter defender live. At 37 ‘, however, there is no net penalty for Parma: Kulusevski is stretched in the area by Barella, the contact is evident. For the referee it is regular, the Var does not intervene because Maresca was in an optimal position to judge and does not evaluate the contact as a penalty “.

Sampdoria-Bologna: Duties 5.5 (Var Massa). “At the 3rd air fight in the Bologna area, Danilo with his high and wide arm hits La Gumina in the face. Duties is well positioned, but lets go on and misses: the intervention was a penalty. Just the penalty granted to Bologna : Murru enters Orsolini late in the area “.

Sassuolo and Verona: Giua 6.5 (Var Di Paolo).

Udinese-Atalanta: Di Bello 6.5 (Var Chiffi). “Race governed very well by the referee from start to finish.”

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.