Sunday, December 7, 2025

Central Texas voters reject three, approve two school district tax inc

by David Harrison – Chief Editor

Central Texas School Tax Elections​ Yield Mixed Results

Central Texas voters signaled a cautious approach to school funding in a series of elections held​ this week, approving tax rate increases for two districts while rejecting proposals ⁣in three others. The outcomes will impact⁢ classroom instruction, teacher pay,‍ and district operations across the region.

Voters in Liberty ⁣Hill ISD approved ‍a tax rate increase expected to generate ⁢$10.9 million for student programming,⁤ staff salaries, utilities, and safety measures. District officials noted they had already implemented $10 million in budget cuts over the past two years. Taylor ISD also secured voter approval for a​ tax rate ⁢of $1.0638 per ⁣$100 of valuation, projected to bring in an additional ‍$650,000 for classroom ⁢instruction, career and‌ technical education, ⁢and othre student programs – a ⁣rate 4 cents ‍lower than the previous year. ​Approximately 59.6%​ of Taylor voters supported the measure.

However, Blanco ISD voters rejected a 2-cent rate ⁤increase that would have generated roughly $500,000 annually ⁣for teacher pay and class size maintenance.⁢ The district now faces a projected $550,000 operating fund ⁢gap, perhaps leading to cuts ‌in student programming. The measure failed ​wiht 52.5% of voters opposed. Coupland ISD ⁢also saw its 3-cent tax rate increase proposal defeated, with 55.8% of the 260 ​voters rejecting the measure which would‍ have generated $241,000 to support⁢ the district’s second ​campus.

These tax rate ⁤elections are a key mechanism under state law allowing school districts to seek voter authorization for rates exceeding those the​ school board can independently adopt. The maintenance and ‌operations tax rate, subject to these elections, directly​ funds essential expenses like⁢ teacher salaries, classroom resources, and building maintenance.

The results echo a broader trend from 2024, where voters in Austin, Manor, and‌ San Marcos approved higher tax⁢ rates, while proposals in Coupland, ⁤Liberty Hill, Marble Falls, ⁤and Seguin failed.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.