Bajjo opened his mind to score 4 goals in the first place. "Fire Bat" protests Pao defeated the harbor game.

“Bat Fai” Sukhothai FC, who recently managed to unlock victory for the first match in the last 7 games, is the open home side, overtaking the PT Prachuap FC 4-3 at Sanam Talay Luang. On Thursday, Feb. 11, 64, four Sukhothai FC goals came from the footsteps of the Sukhothai gods, John Bajjo, who hit a single man, four goals from 2 penalties and two goals. Beautiful helped Sukhothai FC move to 23 points, rising to the top 10.

Daily Siam Football Team Rud interviews John Bajjo with 4 goals scored by the captain of the Fire Bat. Revealed through the team that “I don’t think I can score four goals, but I keep thinking that. What can I do to get the team 3 points?

“In the past, I scored as many as 3 goals in a single game, this is the first time in my life scoring four goals in a game, which is surprising to score four, but if the team wins, it will be more than happy.”

The reporter asked John Bajjo that the 4 goals scored in the game won PT Prachuap 4-3 who would like to give these 4 goals.Who Bajjo became the leader of the Thai League scorer now at 14 goals, revealed that

“I would like to give all 4 goals to the Sukhothai fans. FCs that do not enter the field and who are watching live broadcasts are on the screen. And would like to give to your teammates And would like to give it to the family in Madagascar as well “

The aftermath of the Sukhothai FC attack lost 0-1 Port Authority FC on Saturday, February 6, 64, which the Sukhothai FC board has made a letter protesting the performance of the new referee. Insaad Including the referee in the game Which problem shot occurred in 88 PM from the moment Silasri Kampang, Sukhothai FC opened the ball from the edge of the line into the penalty area, but the ball stuck Worawut Namvej, a defense line at Port FC, used his feet to block a soccer ball before the ball touched the arm raised above the shoulder. And is in an unnatural opening style This blocks the ball so that the opponent does not create the opportunity to score goals in succession. Which the judge decided “No handball” from this kind of ball interception The referee deserves to decide by giving a penalty to Sukhothai FC as evidenced by the protest.