Home » News » B.C. Premier Open to Pipeline Deal, But Tanker Ban Must Stay

B.C. Premier Open to Pipeline Deal, But Tanker Ban Must Stay

by Emma Walker – News Editor

B.C. ‍Premier Signals Potential Support for⁢ New​ Pipeline, Contingent on⁢ Tanker ban

VANCOUVER, B.C. – British Columbia Premier David Eby has indicated he⁣ could support a new oil pipeline project within the province if the federal ⁢government maintains its current ban on oil tankers along the northern coast. The statement marks a potential shift in B.C.’s position as negotiations continue following a recent agreement between Ottawa and Alberta regarding‍ energy policy.

The agreement, which removes an oil⁣ and gas emissions cap, suspends ⁢clean electricity regulations, and aims to facilitate bitumen exports to Asian markets, includes the possibility of adjusting a 2019 law prohibiting oil tankers carrying over 12,500 tonnes of oil from loading or unloading at ports along B.C.’s northern coast.

Alberta has publicly expressed a preference for a pipeline terminating on B.C.’s north coast, specifically in Prince Rupert, according to energy policy ⁣analyst Lisa‍ Svonkin. ‍”Alberta has been clear that they woudl ‌like it to go from B.C.’s north coast,” Svonkin said. “In particular, Prince Rupert‍ would be their stated⁣ preference.” She anticipates Alberta will factor this desire into ongoing discussions with the federal government.

However, maintaining the tanker ban could redirect the pipeline’s destination ⁤to Vancouver, where existing infrastructure⁤ already handles crude oil exports, such as the⁣ Trans ‍Mountain Pipeline’s Westbridge marine terminal in Burnaby.

Eby previously voiced frustration‍ at being excluded from initial negotiations between Ottawa and Alberta. He has also proposed an ⁤option to a new pipeline: increasing the capacity of the ⁣existing Trans Mountain pipeline by approximately 40 percent. The province has already authorized the Vancouver Fraser​ Port Authority to dredge the Second Narrows waterway to allow for increased ⁣oil loading at the Trans ⁤Mountain marine terminal.

Richard Masson, executive fellow at the University of Calgary’s School of Public Policy, ‍highlighted the logistical advantages of Prince Rupert, noting its proximity to both Edmonton and ⁢Asian markets, as well as its lower port congestion compared to⁢ Vancouver. “My understanding is that there are no other ports that could work,” he stated.

Any potential pipeline route will require thorough studies ⁤and ‍consultation with First Nations, Svonkin emphasized. “You can’t do formal consultation‍ on ‌a project if you don’t know what the route is,” she said.

The proposed ⁤pipeline will not receive federal funding and ⁤is expected to generate significant debate. Coastal First Nations in B.C. have already signaled their preparedness to challenge pipeline projects in court.

Offices for ⁤Premier Smith and Premier Eby did not ‌respond to requests for comment on Sunday.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.