Home » News » Armed robber robs a gold shop was shot to death Reasonable or excessive dispute

Armed robber robs a gold shop was shot to death Reasonable or excessive dispute

  • Then he gathered his conscience to hide in the shelter. Using a Benelli M4 semi-automatic long shotgun, he fires 1 shot in the air and 2 shots in the center position to drive off the attacker. But when he saw the culprit turn the gun from outside the shop then shot low angle lumbar again, 1 shot more from shooting training used the principle of using firearms to protect life and the property. Because he doesn’t know what will happen if the bad guy manages to invade and shut down
  • Even though the villain didn’t get the gold, one of the villains was seriously injured. making the man who owns the gold shop worry that he will be prosecuted for unreasonable protection. But I still think this kind of shooting is correct. And later, the lawyers came out to express their views It is a reasonable action, not guilty, and from the CCTV footage evidence, the guilty party fired a gun at the gold shop. Considering that the danger that violates the law still exists Can shoot in defense, not illegal
  • But some think The Gold Shop Owner might be more defensive than reasonable. why the villain ran out of the store and not gold In which there was an argument that as the villain ran out of the store he was pointing his gun and trying to shoot. even escaped he considered the owner of the goldsmith legitimately protect himself No more than any cause

Armed robber robs a gold shop was shot to death Reasonable or excessive dispute

It has become a matter of endless debate in the field of law. But according to “Montri Tanjaisue”, as a firearms expert, he saw that the case that happened was quite borderline, it was too much protection. or reasonable because the criminals who entered the gold shop had guns but the gold shop owner shot outside the shop There were people filming clips outside the shop and seeing the bad guys raise their guns as if they were going to fight. Which issue is for the court to assess whether it is unreasonable or not. After the villain escaped AND there was repeated shooting outside the shop.

“From the point of view of the gun user, this case deserves to be shot. because the villain entered as an attacker There is a shot of the shop window, there is a check and the bar is cut, which is considered very outrageous. Although the principle of shooting a gun to stop a threat must be shot in the legs, but all 4 villains have guns, if they are themselves, they must shoot like this. considered a good decision from events that happened very quickly Shooting the leg is also quite hard to stop. Or in some cases, even if the shot didn’t hit the important point, but after firing 5 shots it couldn’t be stopped. Plus a short gun. There is very little chance of stopping.”

Even the type of gun that the gold shop owner has used for self-defense, considered a very objective choice Because shotguns are perfect to use when faced with situations like this when many criminals come together. It can only fire at a short distance, no more than 25-30 meters, if the shot is closer it can be stopped. But when fired at a distance, the bullet speed will decrease.

Armed robber robs a gold shop was shot to death Reasonable or excessive dispute

From what I saw in the clip, it appears that the gold shop owner is firing a gun in an awkward position. Barely able to shoot in the shoulder position considered very dangerous If the culprit shoots a gun in the park But if you are really going to shoot and hit the bad guy, think this distance for a shotgun can make the bad guy die in the store. must see if the intention is for the bad guy to die or not In very tight and fast situations

As for the gun that the culprit brought to cause the accident, he wondered how to use a gun with a silencer. It seems that the intention and intent of the perpetrator wants the sound to be silent. don’t let the outside listen And if you use 9mm ammunition, it will be even more effective. It was a very outrageous incident. The gunshot threatened the goldsmith shop owner. Stopping the threat in the shooter’s corner is the right decision. Because if the villain shoots the garden He could endanger the people in the gold shop.

Armed robber robs a gold shop was shot to death Reasonable or excessive dispute

“The law in our country considers all types of firearms to be serious. Until many people realize that rifles are good for self-defense. Because the bullet can’t go far. It can stop better than using 9mm or .38mm ammo. Another rifle. or a semi-auto rifle can be occupied more easily. Just having a pellet is fine. It makes people popular to use self defense..

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.