Home » Business » ABA, associations: Time to rethink disclosure requirements for residential mortgage-backed securities

ABA, associations: Time to rethink disclosure requirements for residential mortgage-backed securities

by Priya Shah – Business Editor

SEC ⁤reconsiders RMBS‌ disclosure⁢ Rules, Industry Groups Offer Support

the Securities and Exchange ‌Commission (SEC) is re-evaluating ‍its regulations governing residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS)⁢ following a period with no public offerings in this market.The⁣ move has garnered support from the American Bankers Association and ​seven other industry associations who believe adjustments coudl ‌revitalize the RMBS market and benefit both investors and ​homebuyers.

The current regulatory framework,known as⁢ Regulation AB,underwent meaningful amendments in 2014 in response to the 2008 ​financial crisis. These​ changes introduced⁤ extensive ⁢new reporting requirements for RMBS⁤ securitizations. However, government-sponsored enterprises Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae were ⁣exempt from‌ these ⁢rules, and⁣ subsequently,‌ almost all new private-label RMBS have been⁢ issued through the Rule 144A market – a⁢ private placement ⁢exemption.

The SEC itself has acknowledged the limited effectiveness of the ⁣current ⁢approach, stating that ⁤the absence of​ publicly registered RMBS offerings‍ since the 2014 ⁣amendments “strongly suggests” the regulations are​ not functioning as intended.The commission is specifically⁤ examining whether the detailed asset-level disclosures required under Item 1125 of ⁢Regulation ‌AB are overly burdensome ‍and discouraging public ⁤offerings. ​Furthermore,the SEC is considering aligning⁤ the ⁤definition of “asset-backed security” within⁣ Regulation​ AB with the definition used in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,potentially opening‌ the⁤ public market to a wider⁢ variety of asset classes.

A joint letter from the associations⁤ expressed appreciation for the SEC’s review and outlined support ‍for modifications that would expand the investor base ‌for mortgage credit ​risk,⁤ make ⁢public RMBS issuance more viable for​ issuers, safeguard⁤ consumer privacy, and enhance investor protection.

The groups argue that a more active ‌public‍ RMBS market would increase capital available ⁢for mortgages, potentially leading to lower costs for American ‍families. They also ‍emphasized that a robust private-label RMBS market is crucial for ‍complete⁢ housing finance reform, ⁢a ⁣key priority for the current administration.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.