Sunday, December 7, 2025
Home WorldHow to Train Your Dragon: Understanding China’s Growing Web of Combined Military Exercises and Security Relationships

How to Train Your Dragon: Understanding China’s Growing Web of Combined Military Exercises and Security Relationships

Summary of​ the Article: ‌Monitoring and⁤ Responding to Chinese⁣ Military Exercises

This article, authored ​by Major Jane ​Kaufmann and ⁣Lieutenant commander Chris ‍pagenkopf, argues that the United States needs a ​nuanced and proactive ⁢approach ​to monitoring and responding to Chinese military exercises, notably those conducted within the Shanghai Cooperation Institution (SCO) and ⁢with partners like Russia and Iran.The authors emphasize that ​ the trajectory of these exercises – their increasing⁤ sophistication and integration – is more critically importent than their sheer number.

Here’s a ‌breakdown of the key arguments:

* Beyond Numbers:‍ Focus on Scope & ⁣Integration: ​ The US shouldn’t‍ be ​alarmed by small, symbolic exercises. However, persistent, high-end‍ drills, especially those demonstrating increased PLA integration with other militaries (like Russia in Zapad ⁢exercises), require a reassessment of US posture. Qualitative improvements​ in PLA capabilities are a key ⁣indicator.
*⁣ Monitoring is Crucial: Disciplined monitoring is needed to differentiate between signaling ⁤and genuine operational integration. Examples cited include the ‍sale of advanced air defense systems to Iran coupled with ​combined exercises, and Russia training ⁤Chinese airborne forces.
* Sustained ‍Partnerships are Essential: The US must avoid retrenchment⁤ and actively maintain combined ​training‌ programs with key partners‍ like India and thailand. These exercises should focus on interoperability, crisis response, and ​demonstrate tangible benefits ⁢to partners. This ⁢should be coupled ‍with ​diplomatic and ⁤economic initiatives.
*⁢ Proactive‍ Response to ‌Capability Improvements: If the PLA demonstrates significant ‍qualitative⁤ improvements,the US ⁣should scale up exercises and deployments in⁤ relevant regions,coordinating with NATO and regional ‌allies.‌ The ⁣article provides a specific⁤ example: if Russia and China demonstrate ⁢combined airborne capabilities,the US and allies could respond‍ with forward-deployed air defense units ⁤and intercept exercises.
* The‌ SCO as a Platform: The⁤ SCO provides China with a platform to build military⁣ cooperation, normalize deployments,‍ and strengthen⁤ a security network.
* Dual Challenge⁤ for the US: the⁤ US faces ⁢the challenge of accurately ⁤interpreting Chinese exercises (signaling vs. integration) and simultaneously building strong partnerships across ⁢Eurasia.

In essence, the authors advocate for a strategy of “careful ‍monitoring, ⁣sustained ‍partnership⁢ building, and proactive response” to counter China’s expanding military diplomacy and ensure US national ​security interests are protected. They stress the importance of a complete, coherent​ strategy that signals reliability, long-term commitment, and multilateral ​cooperation.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.