Sunday, December 7, 2025

Federal class action alleges discriminatory work for the dole scheme

by Emma Walker – News Editor

federal ClassAction Seeks Redress for ‘Racially Discriminatory’ Work-for-the-Dole Scheme

CANBERRA – A federal class action ⁣has been lodged against the ‍Commonwealth government alleging its Community ‍Advancement‌ program (CDP),a work-for-the-dole scheme ​operating in remote areas,was racially discriminatory.The⁣ claim, encompassing participants ⁣in Queensland, the Northern Territory, Western Australia, South⁣ australia⁣ and ‌new South Wales⁢ between 2015 and 2021,‌ seeks⁤ the return of penalties paid by participants,⁢ a formal apology, and guarantees against ​recurrence.

The action follows⁤ years of criticism regarding the CDP’s disproportionate ⁣impact on First Nations⁣ Australians and builds on a 2021 settlement with the Ngaanyatjarra traditional​ owners’ council in Western Australia. That settlement saw the government pay $2 million, without admitting liability, after‌ claims the program was racist.​ This new class action aims to broaden redress for those affected across multiple states and territories, arguing the ⁢CDP imposed unfair penalties and lacked genuine employment⁢ opportunities.

“We want to claw back some of the penalties that people paid … we want ⁢the‌ commonwealth to apologise, and we want this not to happen again,” a representative of the claimants stated.⁤

The Albanese⁤ government has already begun dismantling the CDP, replacing it with the⁤ Remote Jobs and Economic Development Program. Indigenous Australians Minister Malarndirri McCarthy highlighted the new ⁢program’s investment of over $700 million, stating, “We have⁣ invested more​ than $700m into our‍ new Remote Jobs and ‌Economic⁣ Development ⁣Program to give First Nations Australians the dignity of real ⁣work, real pay⁢ and⁢ better conditions.” She described the new⁣ program as “a⁢ gamechanger” ⁢focused on ​self-determination, economic opportunity, and community development.

The outcome of the ‌class ⁣action could compel the government to provide further compensation and formally acknowledge the discriminatory ⁤aspects of ​the​ previous scheme, potentially setting​ a precedent for addressing systemic issues in remote employment programs.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.