Sunday, December 7, 2025

Trump Wins Supreme Court Case, Blocks $4bn Foreign Aid Disbursement

by Emma Walker – News Editor

Supreme ⁤Court Allows Trump to Freeze $4 Billion in Foreign Aid

Washington D.C. – The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday delivered another victory to President Donald Trump, allowing his administration to freeze $4 billion in foreign aid previously approved by Congress. The ruling overturns a lower court order demanding the funds be disbursed before a September 30th deadline.

The decision marks the latest instance of the conservative-leaning court ‌broadly interpreting presidential power and represents a meaningful step in the Trump administrationS effort to ‌reshape U.S. foreign aid spending. The funds were allocated ‌for initiatives including United Nations peacekeeping operations and democracy-promotion efforts.

The dispute centered on a tactic known​ as a “pocket rescission,” where the administration sought to prevent the expenditure of funds⁣ by allowing the authorization to expire.U.S. District Judge‍ Amir⁣ ali had previously ‍ordered Trump to release the funds,⁤ warning of a “grave and urgent threat to the separation of powers,” given Congress’s constitutional authority over appropriations.

The White House⁤ argued in court filings that disbursing the funds would be “contrary to US foreign policy.” The administration has previously indicated it intends to overhaul​ U.S. foreign aid,‍ cutting funding to the UN and ⁣significantly‌ altering the role of the U.S. Agency​ for International Development (USAID). ‍Trump has also sought to⁣ redirect funds towards domestic​ immigration ​enforcement.

Critics contend the ⁢cuts will diminish U.S. influence abroad ⁣and perhaps jeopardize long-term national interests. The ⁢administration maintains the move is ‌aimed at responsible spending.

This ruling follows a pattern of the 6-3 conservative majority supreme Court⁤ consistently‍ siding with the Trump administration, frequently enough expanding the scope of executive authority. The “pocket rescission” tactic used in this case was last employed⁣ in 1977, according to the White House.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.