Home » News » Title: Ohio Counties Push to Abandon Voting Machines for Paper Ballots

Title: Ohio Counties Push to Abandon Voting Machines for Paper Ballots

by David Harrison – Chief Editor

Ohio Election Officials Warn Against Returning to Hand-Counted Ballots

Cleveland,​ OH – Concerns are rising over a push to abandon ⁣electronic voting machines in Ohio, with election ⁣experts warning a return to hand-counting ballots would be slower, less accurate, and undermine faith ​in the state’s election system. The debate comes ⁢as some politicians ⁤question the reliability of current voting technology.laura Johnston, a content director at cleveland.com, highlighted the fallibility of ‍human counting with a personal example: “I’m⁤ not an idiot.I took all the hardest math classes, I took calculus and ​I still can’t add up Girl Scout cookie ‍orders correctly every time. So, the idea of hand counting ballots ⁣is ⁢absurd.”

Historically, hand-counting ballots⁢ proved problematic, leading ​to the ‍implementation of machines to expedite the process ⁤and improve accuracy.‌ Election results often ‌took days to finalize under the previous ⁢system,a stark contrast to the speed offered by modern technology.

According‍ to a recent discussion on the “Today in Ohio” podcast,the movement to​ revert to hand-counting aligns with a broader effort to cast doubt on ​the‌ integrity of U.S.⁤ elections. ⁢As podcast host Chris​ Quinn noted, ⁣”This is just part of ⁢that effort​ Donald Trump has been⁢ making for a decade to undermine our faith in‍ the‍ best election system in the‌ world.”

Current election procedures already include safeguards, such as paper backups for hand-counting in close or contested ⁤races. Moreover, ‍voting machines undergo rigorous ​testing and certification processes. Experts argue that abandoning thes ‌machines isn’t ‍about enhancing security, but rather about ​creating distrust in⁢ a system that has consistently demonstrated‌ its⁣ reliability.

The central⁢ question, as posed in‌ the ⁤article, is why some politicians are actively working to erode public confidence ⁣in technologies that⁢ have made⁣ elections more accurate,‍ accessible, and efficient.

Listeners can access the full “Today⁢ in Ohio” podcast discussion here. Full episodes featuring Chris Quinn, Lisa garvin,⁤ Leila Atassi, and Laura‍ johnston are available here.


Note: This rewrite maintains all factual details from the original article, including names, quotes, links, and ​the core argument. It has been re-written for clarity and ‌a ‍breaking-news‍ style lead.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.