The people who raised the suspicion of sexual violence argued that Ki Sung-yong condemned them, but the results of our interview were very different.
Let’s look at the contents of reporter Ha Seong-ryong alone.
The person on the phone with the uncoverer C was Mr. D, a junior who knew Mr. C well, who had no one-sided knowledge with Ki Sung-yong.
On the phone with SBS, junior D, on the premise that he is not on either side, made a different statement from what the revelators have argued so far.
After hearing the report of’Ki Sung-yong’s suspicion of sexual violence, he first called the extortionist C, and recommended reconciliation, saying that it should not be.
[D 씨 : 저는 싸우지 않았으면 좋겠고 화해하길 바랐거든요. 그래서 제가 중재라는 역할을 하고 싶었어요. 선의를 베푼 거고…]
After that, after questioning, junior D contacted Ki Sung-yong and recommended meeting and reconciliation between the two sides.
However, Ki Sung-yong asserted his innocence and said, “If I admit that the sexual violence exposure is false, I will decide whether to forgive it.”
[D 씨 : 누구도 회유와 협박한 적도 단 한 번도 없어요. 그게 진실이란 거죠. 기성용 씨 입에서 돈 얘기 나온 적 없고… 제가 정정보도를 빨리 내라. 그 말을 제가 (폭로자 C 씨에게) 수십 차례 했을 거예요. 그래야 만나준다. 이게 협박인가요? 제가 그래서 협박범이 된 건가요?]
According to Mr. D, there is no content related to conviction or intimidation in the’recording’ that the extortionist said was conclusive evidence.
Mr. D said he was trying to mediate for the sake of goodwill, and said he is having an uneasy day as a blackmailer and hopes the truth will be revealed as soon as possible.
(Video editing: Kim Byung-jik)
▶ “There is evidence of contributing”… Ki Sung-yong’s “strong legal response”
– .
